STAR Format
KSA Examples
By Richard P. Weiss
    KSA stands for Knowledge, Skills and Abilities;
    applicants need to address these qualities when
    answering requirements listed on job vacancy
    announcements currently posted at the eCareer
    section of Liteblue.usps.gov.  Since eCareer
    submissions require narratives that describe actions
    taken to resolve actual situations, the "STAR" format
    is still recommended.  STAR stands for Situation
    and/or Task, Action, and Result.  Unlike 991
    submissions, however, eCareer instructions indicate
    that more than one requirement may be addressed
    in each situational essay.  As the Summary of
    Accomplishments section of the eCareer program
    limits the entire section to 6000 characters,
    addressing multiple requirements within each of
    several essays becomes a necessity, and excessive
    wordiness becomes a liability.  Applicants need to
    recall a situation or problem that they encountered,
    usually in a work situation, that they had to act upon
    to produce a remedy and/or positive result.   These
    experiences do not necessarily need to have taken
    place while working for the Postal Service.  Situations
    may have occurred while working for other
    companies, civic groups, etc.  However, common
    sense would dictate that if you have worked for the
    Postal Service for 20 years, you shouldn't use a
    situation that occurred before your employment
    some 25 years ago.  Try to stick with Postal
    examples whenever possible, and stay fairly current
    (within the past five years, if possible).  The
    important aspect of these essays is to show that you
    possess the knowledge, skills and abilities necessary
    to fill your desired position.

    Here are several KSA essay examples that I have
    written.  For purposes of privacy, I have changed the
    names of those I reference, however the situations
    are genuine.  The first two pertain to Postal
    experience; the third relates to experiences I
    acquired outside of the Postal Service:

    Knowledge of English composition, grammar,
    punctuation and spelling at a level sufficient to
    develop, write and edit technical materials
    including instructions, procedures and training
    materials.

        While assigned as a Retail Associate at the Fox
    Chase Post Office, Philadelphia, PA, I inadvertently
    accepted and cashed a fraudulent Postal money
    order. I discovered that the money order was a fake
    after the same customer who presented this phony
    document returned with another, less convincing
    version. Both the second money order and the one I
    had cashed had been somehow chemically altered
    from $10 to $810. After this incident, I felt a need to
    warn other Retail Associates as well as others who
    might receive these bogus vouchers, especially since
    these fakes contained all of the security features of
    “real” money orders.
        I gathered information that I had noted from
    perusing the Postal Inspection Service’s web site as
    well as other sources, including a Postal
    memorandum that explained that the spelled out
    amount on a Postal money order should never begin
    to the left of the word “amount.” I incorporated this
    data, along with other information that I had
    researched. I also added input based upon my own
    experience in verifying Postal money orders. After
    completing considerable research, I wrote an article
    regarding raised Postal money orders that covered
    information not readily available elsewhere. I
    streamlined the essay into a concise and informative
    training article that I targeted toward thousands of
    Postal employees as well as many others who
    regularly received and dealt with the handling and
    cashing of Postal money orders.   
        Soon after submitting my article to a number of
    publications, my information drew readership from
    thousands of visitors who read it online at PostalMag.
    com, as well as from the Bloomfield Bank corporate
    web site. The article was also picked up and
    published by Pinnacle State bank for use on its web
    site as well as several of its subsidiaries. A shorter
    version appeared in the May 2005 issue of the
    Eastern Area Update, a Postal magazine distributed
    to 138,000 Postal employees working throughout
    the 10-state Eastern Area. My efforts in warning tens
    of thousands of Postal employees and others about
    fraudulent postal money orders have helped to
    assure that they were much more aware of what to
    look for before cashing these documents. My efforts
    have also helped Postal employees to stop criminal
    activity and to protect the sanctity and reputation of
    the US Postal Service.


    Ability to review, revise, and restructure existing
    technical informational materials.

       The implementation of the POS-One System
    greatly streamlined the efficiency of financial file
    transmissions from postal stations to district
    accounting offices.  However, there were still times
    when transmissions failed to transfer all or some of
    the data needed by accounting operations.  Failure
    of station personnel to verify their transmissions
    caused delays in the regeneration and transmission
    of vital financial information to District Accounting
    offices through the use of the Retail Consolidated
    Unit (RCU) system.  Because POS-One
    implementation was new, existing informational
    materials were virtually unavailable.  I decided that I
    needed to write an informative article regarding the
    regeneration process that could be shared, through
    inclusion in my District newsletter, by station
    employees.  I felt that employees could use this
    information to speed up the regeneration process,
    and bring in timely financial information.
       To educate station personnel, I wrote an article,
    directed toward those handling POS transmissions
    within the Philadelphia District, regarding how to
    verify their transmissions, including ways to
    regenerate their files when necessary.  Besides
    using my own knowledge of the POS-One system, I
    collected additional information through a talk with
    Bill Johnson, Postal System Coordinator for the
    Philadelphia District.  I also researched how to verify
    POS-One transmissions by noting information I read





POSTALeCareer.COM
More Information:
eCareer Writing Services
    in the POS-One handbook, utilizing and revising some of
    its material to improve upon the conciseness of my
    article.  After I completed my research and assured that
    all of my facts were sound, I included my article in the
    Financial Focus, a district-wide publication distributed
    throughout over 150 stations and offices throughout
    the Philadelphia District.
       I received very positive feedback regarding my POS-
    One article.  The information I provided to the stations
    made their employees more conscientious in assuring
    that their transmissions took place and more
    knowledgeable of how to complete these transmittals.  
    By providing this information, I greatly decreased the
    time I needed to spend on calling stations regarding
    their transmission, and significantly enhanced the
    timeliness of financial transmissions through POS-One.

    Ability to coordinate and oversee the activities of
    others to meet organizational goals.

       When I was Newsletter Editor for Lifeline, the
    monthly publication for Parents Without Partners,
    Greater Northeast Chapter #582, in Philadelphia, PA, I
    had to meet strict deadlines in gathering information
    from various board members, other chapters, our
    Regional and Zone councils, chairpersons and
    committee people.  I also had to insure a balance
    between social, educational and family activities that
    were scheduled in order to meet the programming
    standards required for our organization as a non-profit
    entity.  For any given month, I was responsible for
    making sure that committee members mailed the
    newsletter by the end of the third week of each month.  
    The January 1998 issue was particularly difficult to
    complete and mail in time, due to the Christmas
    holiday.  During the second week of December, I still
    hadn't received any information for the January
    publication, yet I needed to produce it, get it printed,
    and distribute it to committee people at circulation
    (where members prepare the newsletter for mailing).  
    In addition, due to the Christmas holiday, I had to
    schedule circulation earlier than usual in order for
    members to receive the newsletters in time.  My goal
    was to send out the newsletters to the general
    membership at least a week before January 1.
       Beginning early in the month, I began my monthly
    ritual of gathering and editing write-ups from the Parent
    Social Director, the Family Director, and the Program
    and Education Director.  I called one of my committee
    people associated with our chapter orientations in
    order to receive a list of our new members (for inclusion
    in the newsletter).  I also contacted the Treasurer for
    his monthly Treasury report, the Secretary for her list of
    motions made at our monthly board meeting, and other
    chairpersons and committee people who had
    information relevant to the newsletter.  I wrote
    additional material and combined other information from
    various sources to complete the proof copy of the
    newsletter.  
       After proofreading the finished product for errors, I
    had 400 copies printed and readied them by the
    circulation deadline.  The chapter volunteers prepared
    the newsletters for mailing, so I was able to meet my
    intended deadline and mail them to the general
    membership more than a week before January 1.


    Knowledge of revenue protection programs and
    procedures.

       During the many years I worked as a Bulk Mail
    Technician, I followed strict guidelines in accepting
    presorted mailings; my major responsibilities involved
    assuring that business customers properly presorted
    their mailings, thereby reducing the need for additional
    handling by postal employees.  My ongoing duties in
    this capacity assured that the Postal Service would not
    lose revenue from mailings found to contain more than
    5% presort errors based on an initial cursory review,
    followed by a presort verification, as needed or as
    scheduled.  During one of my assignments as an onsite
    mail acceptance representative at one of our biggest
    mailers (a government agency), I discovered that there
    were no provisions in place for presort verifications.  
    The site did not include a scale for obtaining a piece
    weight nor were any PS 2866 forms (presort verification
    reports) available.  When I first began my rotation at
    this facility, I found the lack of provisions for such
    verifications alarming, especially when I performed a
    cursory review and discovered major problems with
    their level of sortation necessary to qualify for the
    Presorted First Class rates that this mailer had claimed.
       I obtained a copy of PS Form 2866 and initiated a
    presort verification on a mailing presented by this
    agency.  Although I could not include a piece weight
    without the use of a scale, I was able to keep track of
    the number of pieces that were not sorted to the finest
    level possible, and recorded percentages of error based
    on the ratio of errors to the total number of pieces
    included in my sample.  I gathered a target wedge of
    three trays and performed a presort verification.  I
    discovered that about 70% of the mailing contained
    presort errors; I assessed the postage due by using
    this percentage at full rate First Class rates and
    subtracted the Presorted First Class rate on this portion
    claimed by the mailer.  The additional amount of
    postage I assessed to accept the mailing was
    astounding, especially due to the large volume of this
    particular shipment.  I presented my findings to my
    supervisor, Ashley Canter, clearly showing that the
    Postal Service was losing about $400,000 per week
    from the 10 million piece mailings this particular
    government organization mailed on a regular basis.  
    She immediately contacted Rob Wilson, of the Rates
    and Classification Service Center (RCSC) to discuss my
    findings.
       Within a week of my discovery as well as my
    recommendations for a regularly scheduled presort
    verification program, Business Mail Entry took my lead
    by incorporating a presort verification requirement as a
    standard operating procedure at this mail acceptance
    facility.  The newly enforced provisions prompted
    representatives at the agency to more closely monitor
    those responsible for preparing their mailings, thereby
    saving the Postal Service millions of dollars in potentially
    lost revenue.
    Experience with serving the writing needs of Postal Professionals since 2005